Students will examine A's game artifacts, compare pressure and performance in a short baseball skills trial, and gather first-round empathy evidence about how stats, confidence, and mental health connect for different players.

Students will define a focused baseball improvement challenge by sorting evidence from observations, stats, and player stories into patterns, then writing a clear How Might We statement and user-centered problem frame for the player growth journal and team scouting work.

Students will generate multiple evidence-based ideas for a baseball player improvement plan, then narrow to one promising direction by checking it against user needs, performance data, and mental health considerations.

Students will turn their selected idea into a first-draft baseball improvement prototype by using evidence from stats, interviews, and wellness tracking, then revise that draft through structured peer feedback before moving into user testing.

Students will test their baseball player growth journal or team scouting-report prototype with peers, collect specific feedback on data use, pressure and mental health connections, and usability, then document one evidence-based revision they will make next.

Students will use a structured critique protocol to evaluate their baseball player growth journal or scouting report draft, give feedback to 2 peers, receive feedback tied to data, motion/skill evidence, and wellness planning, and make one clear revision that strengthens how their improvement plan responds to pressure, performance, and enjoyment of the game.

Students will document what they learned from baseball data, interviews, testing, and revision; present a concise evidence-based reflection on their player growth journal and improvement plan; and name realistic next steps for performance, wellness, and long-term enjoyment of the game.