Students investigate how a chosen drug affects the brain and body and evaluate its therapeutic uses, window, schedule, history, tolerance, dependence, addiction, counterfeit risks, interactions, and stakeholders. Building on a pharmacist’s visit, they synthesize credible scientific sources into a research paper, exhibit, and multimedia teach-back that accurately communicate benefits, dangers, and trade-offs. Partner feedback and gallery-style critiques guide revisions before students present to peers, families, and the pharmacist at the Know the Trade-Offs Celebration. A final self-assessment and gallery-walk reflection document how their knowledge and perspectives on drug safety and honest communication with health professionals have grown.
Learning goals
Students will conduct sustained, self-directed research using credible scientific sources to explain a chosen drug’s therapeutic window, schedule, history, uses, brain and body effects, tolerance, dependence, addiction potential, interactions, and counterfeit risks. They will evaluate the drug’s benefits, dangers, and stakeholders through safety, cost, reliability, and social and ethical trade-offs, then paraphrase and synthesize evidence accurately in a research paper. Students will collaborate through milestone conferences and gallery critiques, using feedback to revise a clear research exhibit and multimedia teach-back for peers, families, and the pharmacist. They will communicate with empathy about medical use and misuse, explain why honesty with health professionals matters, and reflect on how their understanding of drug safety and trade-offs has grown.
Standards
[Common Core] CCSS.ELA-Literacy.WHST.9-10.7 - Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
[Common Core] CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.7 - Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
[Next Generation Science Standards] HS-ETS1-3 - Evaluate a solution to a complex real-world problem based on prioritized criteria and trade-offs that account for a range of constraints, including cost, safety, reliability, and aesthetics, as well as possible social, cultural, and environmental impacts.
[Next Generation Science Standards] 9-12.AF.8.1 - Critically read scientific literature adapted for classroom use to determine the central ideas or conclusions and/or to obtain scientific and/or technical information to summarize complex evidence, concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms.
[Next Generation Science Standards] 9-12.AF.3.3 - Plan and conduct an investigation or test a design solution in a safe and ethical manner including considerations of environmental, social, and personal impacts.
Competencies
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving - Students consider a variety of innovative approaches to address and understand complex questions that are authentic and important to their communities.
Effective Communication - Students practice listening to understand, communicating with empathy, and share their learning through exhibiting, presenting and reflecting on their work.
Collaboration - Students co-design projects with peers, exercise shared-decision making, strengthen relational agency, resolve conflict, and assume leadership roles.
Content Expertise - Students develop key competencies, skills, and dispositions with ample opportunities to apply knowledge and engage in work that matters to them.
Self Directed Learning - Students use teacher and peer feedback and self-reflection to monitor and direct their own learning while building self knowledge both in and out of the classroom.
Products
Students will turn notes from the pharmacist’s launch presentation into a self-generated research question and source log focused on drug safety, interactions, and trade-offs. At research milestones, they will develop and peer-revise an evidence-based paper addressing the drug’s brain and body effects, therapeutic window, schedule, uses, history, tolerance, dependence, addiction and counterfeit risks, and who benefits from its manufacture or creation. Students will transform their findings into a research exhibit and short multimedia teach-back, using partner feedback and gallery-style sticky-note critiques to revise both the exhibit and presentation script. At the Know the Trade-Offs Celebration, students will present to peers, families, and the pharmacist, then complete a self-assessment and gallery-walk reflection on how their understanding of drug benefits, risks, and safety has changed.
Launch
Begin with the pharmacist sharing a realistic, anonymized patient scenario involving an undisclosed medication and an interaction with a common food or supplement. In teams, students analyze symptom, medication, and interaction cards to identify missing information, possible benefits and risks, and why complete honesty with health professionals matters. The pharmacist reveals the case outcome, explains their role, and answers student questions about therapeutic windows, dependence, addiction, and counterfeit drugs. Students then choose an initial drug of interest and generate questions about how it works, who benefits, and how people can judge its safety trade-offs.
Exhibition
Host a “Know the Trade-Offs Celebration” where students present research exhibits and short multimedia teach-backs to peers, families, and the visiting pharmacist. Each exhibit should communicate the drug’s effects on the brain and body, therapeutic window, schedule, uses, history, tolerance, dependence, addiction and counterfeit risks, interactions, and who benefits from its manufacture. Before the event, students use gallery-style sticky-note feedback to revise their exhibits, presentation scripts, and research papers for accuracy, clarity, and respectful communication. Audience members record one benefit, one risk, and one remaining question at each station, and students conclude with a self-assessment and gallery-walk reflection on how their understanding has changed.