Learning Goals
Students will be able to analyze a review’s point of view and cultural perspective in a 2026 cultural work from outside the United States to evaluate how identity shapes criticism.
Students will be able to write an original review of a 2026 cultural work with a clear claim, relevant evidence, and convincing reasoning for a public audience.
Students will be able to revise review drafts by strengthening structure, tone, and language choices to fit an authentic editorial audience.
Students will be able to synthesize mentor reviews and peer feedback to refine an original critical stance on a 2026 work.
Students will be able to justify editorial choices in a published review by explaining how audience, voice, and evidence support the final piece.
Products
Submission-Ready New York Times-Style Review with Annotated Research Notes
Each student writes and revises an original review of one 2026 cultural work and submits it in a polished, publication-ready format. The product includes annotated mentor-text notes and a brief reflection showing how user feedback and editorial revision improved the review.
Critics’ Roundtable Problem Statement and Collaborative Review Pitch Deck
Teams combine individual research to craft a shared problem statement about why the chosen work matters, then build a higher-fidelity pitch deck or presentation that previews the strongest review angle and evidence. The deck uses peer feedback and a clear editorial rationale to prepare the review for authentic audience sharing.
No rubric has been generated yet.