|
Deeper Learning Competencies
|
Effective Communication
|
- I can share my ideas clearly about my learning-space design by using labels and simple sentences on my map/model (what I built and why it helps learners)
- I can listen to teammates during planning and respond respectfully to their suggestions using kind, specific words.
|
- I can explain how area and perimeter helped shape my design choices using math terms (area, perimeter, rectangle) in my sketches and calculations
- I can communicate with empathy during critiques by asking clarifying questions, restating a peer’s idea fairly, and using feedback to improve my work.
|
- I can present my design thinking step-by-step, connecting my measurements, scale, and space features to fairness and usefulness for learners
- I can collaborate during gallery walks and feedback sessions by comparing ideas, disagreeing respectfully, and reaching shared decisions about revisions that strengthen the final model and materials list.
|
- I can deliver a clear, organized presentation at the Blueprint Expo that includes my evidence (measurements, area/perimeter reasoning, scale accuracy) and a spoken reflection of growth
- I can engage in respectful, empathetic communication with diverse partners by using their feedback to make thoughtful revisions and explain how my thinking and collaboration improved over time.
|
|
Deeper Learning Competencies
|
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving
|
- I can use area and perimeter formulas to find answers for rectangles in my design tasks and I explain which measurements I used
- I can describe a simple problem I’m solving (for example, how to represent a space) and try one possible design adjustment based on evidence from my measurements.
|
- I can apply area and perimeter formulas for rectangles to compare design options and choose the one that best fits my learning-space goal
- I can justify my choice by citing my calculations and explain how a specific feedback comment or measurement mismatch leads me to revise my plan.
|
- I can use area and perimeter together to troubleshoot inconsistencies between my scaled map and the real classroom space
- I can propose multiple design strategies (e.g., changing dimensions or layout) and select the most equitable, useful option, explaining my reasoning with accurate calculations and references to feedback.
|
- I can independently refine my learning-space model by connecting area, perimeter, and scale to solve complex real-world design problems
- I can evaluate trade-offs across fairness, usefulness, and accuracy, revise my plan in a purposeful way, and clearly explain how my solutions and critiques show my problem-solving growth.
|
|
Deeper Learning Competencies
|
Collaboration
|
- I can work with my team to share materials and take turns measuring or sketching a rectangular space, while listening to teammates’ ideas during our design discussions
- I can treat others with respect and include everyone’s input when we make simple decisions.
|
- I can coordinate with my team to divide tasks (measuring, calculating area/perimeter, drawing a scaled map, and listing materials) and explain my part clearly
- I can use teammates’ feedback from gallery walks to make one specific revision to our plan, while staying respectful and helping the team stay on track.
|
- I can co-design our learning-space model by proposing and justifying design choices using area and perimeter relationships for rectangles
- I can collaborate in ways that solve problems (for example, if we disagree about scale or measurements) and incorporate multiple teammate suggestions to improve accuracy and fairness.
|
- I can lead collaborative revision by building on teammates’ ideas, modeling effective communication, and helping the team reach shared decisions about scale, measurements, and equitable space use
- I can treat differences as strengths, contribute thoughtfully to conflict resolution, and show through our revised drawings, calculations, and presentation notes how our teamwork improved the final blueprint.
|
|
Deeper Learning Competencies
|
Content Expertise
|
- I can use area and perimeter formulas for rectangles to solve problems about a real learning space, showing my work with correct units and labels
- I can measure (or use given measurements) and plug them into the formulas accurately in my sketches and calculations.
|
- I can apply area and perimeter formulas for rectangles to design and explain parts of my learning-space model, making calculations that match the measurements I took
- I can check my results and fix small errors using feedback so my design choices are based on math, not guesses.
|
- I can use area and perimeter calculations to compare multiple rectangle layout options for my model and choose the most useful and fair space
- I can revise my scaled map and calculations when feedback shows my measurements, scale, or labels don’t accurately represent the classroom or playground.
|
- I can independently create and revise a scaled rectangle design that uses area and perimeter to support equitable learning for everyone, clearly connecting math to design decisions
- I can strengthen my final blueprint by integrating feedback from others, accurately matching measurements to the scale and explaining how my calculations guide improvements.
|
|
Deeper Learning Competencies
|
Academic Mindset
|
- I can explain what I notice and wonder about using area and perimeter in a learning-space design, and I can try a first solution by measuring and recording my rectangle’s values with support from my team and rubric.
|
- I can use feedback to revise my measurements, calculations, or scale and describe what I changed and why; I can also show respect for others’ ideas while making decisions that support an equitable learning space.
|
- I can take responsibility for improving my scaled map and model by checking my work against area/perimeter formulas and the scaled plan; I can persist through challenges and thoughtfully incorporate partner/guest feedback into my project folder.
|
- I can independently lead my own revision cycle—setting a goal, testing and correcting my measurements and scale accuracy, and justifying my design choices with fairness in mind; I can reflect on how my thinking grew and how treating others with respect strengthened our collaboration.
|