Students will brainstorm and identify an arguable question related to the narrator's reliability and take an initial position, engaging in a collaborative workshop to share and refine their perspectives, using textual evidence and psychological theory.

Students will collaboratively analyze textual evidence from the novel to discern and evaluate examples of the narrator's bias or mental instability, utilizing peer feedback and reflection sessions to refine their understanding and build persuasive arguments backed by psychological theory.

Students will construct and refine their evidence-based arguments in small groups, focusing on presenting claims with supporting textual evidence, evaluating narrator reliability, anticipating counterarguments, and ensuring logical coherence, while engaging in peer feedback sessions to strengthen their argumentation and understanding.

Students will engage in a culminating public exhibition where they present their evidence-based interpretations on the narrator's reliability, deliver persuasive arguments using multimedia presentations to substantiate their claims, and participate in a panel discussion to address real-time counterarguments and audience inquiries.