Students will launch the Geometry Courtroom project by analyzing a flawed geometric argument, testing claims against constructions and theorem-based reasoning, and producing an initial case card that sets up later research, proof writing, and revision.

Students will gather evidence about how people misread geometric claims, test those assumptions against constructions and theorem-based reasoning, and turn their findings into a design brief that identifies the proof moves, measures, and diagrams their later courtroom prototype must support.

Students will turn their researched proof ideas into testable Geometry Courtroom prototypes, run structured feedback cycles with peers and a new user, and refine one case exhibit that clearly connects construction evidence, solved measures, and formal reasoning.

Students will present and defend their final Geometry Courtroom case exhibits to authentic jurors, use feedback to strengthen one final proof move, and submit polished evidence of their reasoning growth.