🪞 Designer Evidence Circle

Students complete a brief self-rating and then join a structured circle to share how character choices, branching scenes, and prototype revisions affected teamwork, emotional response, and historical accuracy. Before speaking, each student gives feedback to 2 peers using the rubric language, receives feedback from classmates, and revises one claim in their written reflection to better match evidence from playtests, festival observations, or research notes. The final submission combines a short designer reflection with peer/self-assessment evidence.