🗂️ Two Project Directions Review

Participants convert their strongest ideas into two concise project direction boards that include a user-centered problem statement, target learners, draft standards alignment, possible interactive artifact, and key assumptions to test in the next phase. Teams give feedback to 2 peers, receive feedback using a shared critique tool informed by UVA School of Education criteria and community relevance indicators, and revise their direction boards before submitting them as a progression checkpoint. The facilitator closes with a brief selection protocol so teams document why these two directions are stronger than the alternatives and what evidence still needs testing.