🗣️ Book Club Critique Round

Using the mid-project protocol, each group shares draft speaking points for its recorded panel response and individual one-minute claim. Students give feedback to 2 peers, receive feedback, and revise by checking for logical gaps, weak evidence links, unsupported fairness claims, and missing counterargument responses. Groups then tighten their discussion notes and create a short revised set of panel talking points that names how their thinking changed after critique.