Deliverable

❓ How Might We Statement Draft

Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Effective Communication Collaboration Essential Question Submission Required

Using their top theme, each group writes one focused How Might We statement that names a specific user (e.g., Vietnamese refugee elder, child of refugees, new student learning this history) and a core need grounded in interview evidence. Groups add a 3–4 sentence rationale citing at least two direct quotes and explaining why this problem matters to California communities. They check that the statement is not a solution in disguise.

Plan day
Day 2
Duration
15 min
Grouping
Small Group
Steps
5 steps

Lesson plan

5 steps · 15 min
# What teachers do
1 Introduction: Briefly review the essential questions about Vietnamese refugees and their impact on communities. Explain the goal of drafting a How Might We statement. (5 min)
2 Group Discussion: In groups, discuss insights from empathy interviews and literature. Identify a specific user and core need. (10 min)
3 Drafting: Each group drafts a How Might We statement, ensuring it is user-centered and not a solution. (10 min)
4 Rationale Development: Groups write a 3–4 sentence rationale using at least two direct quotes from interviews or literature. (10 min)
5 Peer Sharing: Groups share their statements and rationales with another group for initial feedback. (10 min)
Preparation (1 item)
  • Prepare a list of key insights from empathy interviews and literature for students to reference.
Student-facing instructions
Your task is to work in groups to draft a How Might We statement that focuses on a specific user and need related to Vietnamese refugees. Use insights from your empathy interviews and literature to inform your statement. Then, write a rationale with at least two quotes explaining why this issue is important. Share your draft with another group for feedback.