🔍 HMW Peer Critique & Final Design Brief

Students exchange drafts in pairs and use a checklist to determine whether the problem statement is grounded in real user evidence or based on assumptions. Each student gives feedback to 2 peers, receives feedback, and revises their POV and selects one strong How Might We question. They submit a final one-page Design Brief including: user description, central idea statement, 1 chosen HMW question, and a short rationale explaining how interview and text evidence shaped the problem definition.