Deliverable

💬 Peer Feedback Carousel

Public policy Reflection Core Content Essential Question Critique and Revision Submission Required

Teams rotate to review two other groups’ concept sketches. Students leave warm and cool feedback using sticky notes aligned to rubric categories (User Understanding, Problem Definition, Creativity, Feasibility). Each team receives feedback from at least two peer groups and discusses patterns before revising.

Plan day
Day 3
Duration
Grouping
Whole Class
Steps
6 steps

Lesson plan

6 steps
# What teachers do
1 Introduce the activity and essential question on how individual and community actions can reduce carbon footprints. (10 min)
2 Explain the carousel method. Each team will leave warm and cool feedback on two other groups' concept sketches using sticky notes. (5 min)
3 Teams rotate to the first partner group's sketches, leaving feedback aligned to rubric categories: User Understanding, Problem Definition, Creativity, and Feasibility. (15 min)
4 Movement break. Students walk around as a transition to the next group rotation. (5 min)
5 Teams rotate to the second partner group's sketches and repeat the feedback process. (15 min)
6 Teams review the feedback received on their sketches, identify patterns, and discuss areas for improvement. (10 min)
Preparation (3 items)
  • Prepare a set of sticky notes for each team labeled with rubric categories: User Understanding, Problem Definition, Creativity, and Feasibility.
  • Create an anchor chart with the essential question and rubric criteria for reference.
  • Arrange the classroom so teams can easily rotate between sketch stations without creating chaos.
Student-facing instructions
You will rotate around the classroom to review and give feedback on concept sketches from two other teams. Use sticky notes to leave warm (positive) and cool (constructive) feedback based on the rubric categories: User Understanding, Problem Definition, Creativity, Feasibility. Afterward, review the feedback received on your sketches, look for patterns, and discuss what can be improved based on peer comments.